Audio-Technica ATH-W3000ANV

Обзор пользователя (amazon.com)

Amazon.com review summary for Audio-Technica ATH-W3000ANV

alaTest has collected and analyzed 6 user reviews of Audio-Technica ATH-W3000ANV from Amazon.com. The average user rating for this product is 4.0/5, compared to an average user rating of 3.9/5 for other Headphones on Amazon.com. People really like the comfort and durability. The price and design are also appreciated, but many are negative about the bass quality.

sound, design, price, durability, comfort

bass quality

83% of the reviews on Amazon.com give this product a positive rating.

Дек, 2024

Обзор эксперта: : Tom Andry (audioholics.com)

Audio-Technica ATH-W3000ANV Limited Edition Wooden Over-Ear Headphones Preview

The Audio-Technica ATH-W3000ANV employ large 53 mm aperture drivers featuring specially built 2-part magnetic circuits that produce high speed magnetic streams plus "numerous additional refinements".

We've had a little fun here at Audio-Technica's expense but, when you tell us everything your headphones are made out of EXCEPT the drivers and magnets (you know, the bits that actually make the noise?), well, we couldn't help ourselves. We're sure the...

Янв, 2012

Партнер

Читать обзор полностью

Обзор эксперта: : AVguide (avguide.com)

Audio-Technica ATH-W3000ANV 50th Anniversary Headphones (Playback 57)

You know a headphone is expensive when it has a serial number. Audio-Technica's ATH-W3000ANV headphone review sample was #1505 (the MSRP for the headphone is $1,299.95, though street pricing may be considerably lower). As befits a 50th anniversary...

Июн, 2012

Читать обзор полностью

Обзор пользователя (head-fi.org)

ATH-W3000ANV, the wooden beauty with a oh -so-sweet voice to backup

One of my regret back in 2012 was not being able to secure a pair of W3000ANV when it launched. Luckily I was able to pick up a second hand pair in excellent condition lately. W3000ANV is one of the many products Audio Technica made in celebration of...

Lush, inviting euphonic sound with great PRaT

Not the most technically capiable, not neutral

Фев, 2015

Читать обзор полностью