HP Photosmart C215

Сервисом alaTest было собрано и проанализировано 121 обзор для HP Photosmart C215. Средняя оценка этого товара 3.1/5, в сравнении со средней оценкой 4.3/5 для других Компактные камеры. Отзывы о качестве экрана и портативности в общем положительные, качество экрана и портативность также получили хорошие отзывы, но объектив и видоискатель получили критические мнения. Были получены разные комментарии о качество сборки.

удобстве использования, качестве изображения, портативности, качестве экрана

батарее, производительности, увеличении, видоискателе, объективе

Мы проанализировали оценки экспертов и пользователей, дату выпуска продукта и другие факторы. По сравнению с другими товарами из категории Компактные камеры, HP Photosmart C215 получил alaScore™ 75/100 = Хорошее качество!

Анализ обзоров

(Основано на 121 обзорах)



  Показать положительные (100%)Пока нет(Показать все)
работа при низкой освещённости
  Показать положительные (100%)Пока нет(Показать все)

Показано 121 обзор(ов)

Эксперты Пользователи


Ниже список обзоров для этого или подобных продуктов. Если вы думаете, эта группировка не так, пожалуйста, нажмите здесь, чтобы флаг.
Подробнее на стр Ответы на Ваши вопросы.
Показаны 1 - 12 из 121 Показать обзоры: по Русский | из других стран

Обзор пользователя (amazon.co.uk)

Amazon.co.uk review summary for HP Photosmart C215


alaTest has collected and analyzed 2 user reviews of HP Photosmart C215 from Amazon.co.uk. The average user rating for this product is 5.0/5, compared to an average user rating of 4.3/5 for other Digital Compact Cameras on Amazon.co.uk. People are impressed by the portability. The usability is also mentioned favorably.

usability, portability

100% of the reviews on Amazon.co.uk give this product a positive rating.

Это резюме основано на товарах: HP Photosmart C215 Digital CameraHP Photosmart C215 Digital Camera

Апр, 2018

Обзор пользователя (photographyreview.com)

Hewlett-Packard PhotoSmart C215/215xi


Don't buy this camera. Sucks up 4 AA batteries for every 20-30 pictures. HP provides absolutely no support for hardware or software problems. If you upgrade to Windows 2000 or Windows XP you have to BUY new driver CD's from HP. I've searched for almost...

Maybe a beginner would appreciate the quality for the price.

Expensive to maintain. No free driver updates.

Июл, 2003

Обзор пользователя (photographyreview.com)

Hewlett-Packard PhotoSmart C215/215xi


Good camera for the price, especially being 2+ years old. Battery life is an issue, but get some Engergizer 1600 mAh rechargables and you won't regret it. (I actually have a mixed set of 1200 and 1600 and it gives me no problems at all) The batteries...

Simple point and click photos, good resolution, an idiot can work this thing.

Viewfinder is off, kinda anoying.

Июл, 2003

Обзор пользователя (photographyreview.com)

Hewlett-Packard PhotoSmart C215/215xi


Don't buy it and don't buy anything else from HP.

It's not a bad camera. Takes a decent with the right lighting.

Where do I start. Sucks up batteries. Uses 4 AA for every 24 to 36 pictures. If you leave the batteries in the camera when the camera is off...it'll drain the batteries dry. Worst weakness is a lack of support from HP. If you upgrade to XP OS then you...

Мар, 2003

Обзор пользователя (photographyreview.com)

Hewlett-Packard PhotoSmart C215/215xi


well, it does it's job - but not much more (for 500 NIS - israeli shequel about 100USD). It's a nice cam for taking casual pictures. With a 64 MB Memory card I took about 200 Pictures. Since the auto-focus is not that good i recommend 2 pictures...

easy-to-use cheap easy menu

batteries batteries batteries batteries batteries batteries batteries batteries

Фев, 2003

Обзор пользователя (photographyreview.com)

Hewlett-Packard PhotoSmart C215/215xi


It is a great camera for the price MP 1.3. But for the XP drivers you will need to buy them at HP.com for $10.95 and wait 5 days for the CD or 2 days you pay more. So after this i give it a bad report for service and quality effect.

Its Cheap and it will get you started in the digital world.. I Would save up the extra $200 and get into SLRs, or higher end 3.0 Digy cameras.

Very low budget camera shell. 1 drop and say good by to it, DRIVERS for XP will cost you money!!!, time!!, and effort!!! Stay away from HP products in the Camera area just a warning if you want to make good images!! Makes a great toy for my 5 year old!

Ноя, 2002

Обзор пользователя (photographyreview.com)

Hewlett-Packard PhotoSmart C215/215xi


Good camera. But it does not contain XP drivers and HP want's to charge you for the drivers. Stay away!

Ноя, 2002

Обзор пользователя (photographyreview.com)

Hewlett-Packard PhotoSmart C215/215xi


Terrible camera. Consumes batteries in less than 10 pictures. View finder is not accurate, pictures are never centered! Slow to "snap" not at all useful. What a piece of junk!


eats batteries, inaccurate view finder, very slow to snap.

Июн, 2002

Обзор пользователя (photographyreview.com)

Hewlett-Packard PhotoSmart C215/215xi


Decent camera. I am a web developer and use the camera to take high-quality images for 72 dpi screen display. Reading the reviews, I see that many others who have used this camera have been very disappointed. So far, my camera has held up for better...

The menu system is easy to use. The auto iris is very impressive. Even indoors with low light, I can disable the flash and still get a nice clean bright picture. I chose this camera deliberately over the others in its class due to low price, easy menu...

As with any home digital camera, the software is worthless. I installed only the driver for the camera and use Photoshop to manipulate the images. My camera came with a 4 meg Compact Flash card. I immediately upgraded to a 48 meg card and can squeeze...

Май, 2002

Обзор пользователя (photographyreview.com)

Hewlett-Packard PhotoSmart C215/215xi


I know you get what you paid for. Since the HP 215 is really cheap I can live with a few imperfections. But still, there is some major flaws (even at this price) : o 10 pictures max with a new set of batteries o Can''t use rechargable batteries o Must...

Price ...

o Very slow to open up o Very slow to refresh the preview o Don''t keep settings o Very poor battery life o Can''t user rechargable betteries o Must pay for software/drivers updates

Май, 2002

Обзор пользователя (dooyoo.co.uk)



This is my first digital camera and for the money I think it is excellent value. Easy to use - Advantages: inexpensive, simple to use, comes with everything to get started - Disadvantages: chews up batteries, t rechargers seem ok

Мар, 2002

Лучшие 5 Цифровые фотоаппараты

Похожие Цифровые фотоаппараты

  • Одинаковый
  • Одинаковые